TJ Ryan Foundation Research Associate John Quiggin writes in The Conversation (14.5.20) that many Australians are going to need some sort of wage subsidy well beyond a six-month timeframe to support them through the pandemic downturn. The author suggests the best kind of subsidy would be 'portable' and not tied to previous employment.
'As an emergency response to the potential mass unemployment created by the sudden lockdown, the Morrison government’s JobKeeper program has been reasonably successful. An estimated 700 000 employers, accounting for 4.7 million workers have signed up.
'On the other hand, the sign up of workers has been been about one million less than expected. Plenty of problems have emerged with limits on coverage.
'Some reflect the difficulty of defining a “job” in an environment in which permanent employment has been eroded in favour of casual employment and contracting and the gig economy.
'Others seem arbitrary, such as the effective exclusion of local government and university employees, and workers whose employers are companies owned by foreign governments.
'There will be bigger problems as time goes on.'
- We need to plan for life after JobKeeper now. We need to make it portable »
- How to tweak JobKeeper, if we must »
- If we want workers to stay home when sick, we need paid leave for casuals »
- That estimate of 6.6 million Australians on JobKeeper, it tells us how it can be improved »
- JobKeeper is quick, dirty and effective: there was no time to make it perfect »
- JobKeeper payment: how will it work, who will miss out and how to get it? »
- A new normal? Instead Australia looks like it could return to 'business as usual' after the pandemic »
- The government says artists should be able to access JobKeeper payments. It's not that simple »
- Dutton breaks ranks over 'flexible' extension to JobKeeper payments »
- Why even the best case for jobs isn't good. We'll need more JobKeeper »
- JobKeeper for childcare out, renovations in: Morrison's perplexing experiment turns the focus from women to men »
- Extending free childcare could fuel huge boost to economy, report says »
- Post-pandemic, here's the case for a participation income »
- JobKeeper review has landed - but will we see it before the Eden-Monaro by-election? »
- Forget JobSeeker. In our post-COVID economy, Australia needs a 'liveable income guarantee' instead »
- Jobseeker should stay 'stronger for longer' for those excluded from other payments, report says »
- Early tax cuts, 'another phase' of JobKeeper likely as second wave cripples Melbourne »
- Builders, architects grab largest share of JobKeeper payments, figures show »
- There's serious talk about a 'job guarantee', but it's not that straightforward »
- Increasing the childcare subsidy will help struggling families - and the economy »
- Government to announce revamped wage subsidy amid huge COVID uncertainty »
- JobKeeper and JobSeeker 2.0 look like failing three vital tests »
- We have a right to expect government to do what markets cannot: social and economic protection for all of us »
What'll happen when the money's snatched back? Our looming coronavirus support cliff
Danielle Wood and Nathan Blane write in The Conversation (14.5.20) that when Australia's coronavirus support payments cease by the end of October, it'll leave a gaping hole in needed relief for workers and the economy.
'At almost 10% of gross domestic product, and a much larger per cent of government spending, Australia’s fiscal response to the COVID-19 crisis has been one of the biggest in the world.
'The government is spending an average of A$26 billion a month on programs that didn’t exist in February.
'To put that in perspective, before COVID-19 the government’s total average monthly expenditure this financial year was going to be $42 billion.
'While far from perfect, these emergency measures have been successful at supporting the incomes of many households and businesses.
'But, as this chart shows, each and every one will be gone by the end of October, making October a very dangerous time for businesses and for the economy.'
- What'll happen when the money's snatched back? Our looming coronavirus support cliff »
- A hard end date to coronavirus stimulus JobKeeper, JobSeeker packages could sink economy in September, warn experts »
- Australian households face grim financial outlook as coronavirus unemployment rises »
- Were it not for JobKeeper, unemployment would be 11.7%, up from 5.2% in one month. Here's how the numbers pan out »
- Morrison government stares down push to end jobkeeper scheme early »
- Snapback? Fiscal stimulus hasn't even started yet »
- When the Coronavirus Supplement stops, JobSeeker needs to increase by $185 a week »
- Treasury revises JobKeeper's cost down by massive $60 billion, sparking calls to widen eligibility »
- Coronavirus supplement rollback could be 'devastating' for women in wake of pandemic »
- Scrapping jobkeeper too early risks Australian economy falling off a cliff, Covid inquiry told »
- How to improve JobKeeper (hint: it would help not to pay businesses late) »
- Logan business owners struggling to stay afloat, prompting plea to extend JobKeeper subsidy »
- Young women are hit doubly hard by recessions, especially this one »
- Australia must reject austerity and embrace targeted spending to beat this recession »
- Weary and wary: Businesses welcome newfound freedom but warn of cliff ahead »
- Low-paid, young women: the grim truth about who this recession is hitting hardest »
- If architecture is the canary in the coalmine, the outlook for construction is appalling »
- Grattan on Friday: Does Victoria's second wave suggest we should debate an elimination strategy? »
- Cutting taxes for the wealthy is the worst possible response to this economic crisis »
- First we feared how bad Australia's economy might get. Now we worry how long it will be so bad »
- The compromise that might just boost the JobSeeker unemployment benefit »
- 'The cliff': what happens when Australia's coronavirus stimulus runs out of road? »