Francis Markham and Bhiamie Williamson write in The Conversation (30.7.20) that the federal government's new Closing the Gap agreement lacks important detail about who will be responsible for meeting targets.
'The Morrison government has finally unveiled the long-awaited new National Agreement on Closing the Gap.
'After more than two years of consultation, and a year of negotiations, Prime Minister Scott Morrison was full of praise for the new agreement, saying it was “realistic” and would have “very meaningful impact”. Coalition of Peaks lead negotiator Aunty Pat Turner similarly described it as a “huge step forward”.
'The new agreement is an important achievement by the Coalition of Peaks. This is yet another example of Indigenous people exercising their agency and should be applauded.
'Notwithstanding this, close examination of the new targets reveal both important gains and unanswered questions about power sharing.'
- We have 16 new Closing the Gap targets. Will governments now do what's needed to meet them? »
- Chelsea Bond: The 'new' Closing the Gap is about buzzwords, not genuine change for Indigenous Australia »
- There are 3 new Closing the Gap education targets: here's what they miss »
- Closing the Gap prison reduction targets show 'disappointing lack of ambition', lawyers say »
- Closing the Gap agreement reset with 16 new targets to improve lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians »
- Orwell that ends well? »
- A steep climb ahead, but the landscape has become clearer for Closing the Gap »
- ‘Closing the Gap’ process will better involve Indigenous Australians: Morrison »
- Closing the Gap review finds policy 'effectively abandoned' amid 'extensive funding cuts' »
- Our national shame: Closing the gap for Indigenous Australians is more important than ever »