Aidan Ricketts writes in The Conversation (2.9.19) about proposed moves by the Palaszczuk government to outlaw environmental protestors’ use of ‘lock-on devices’ as a means of civil disobedience.
‘In the 30 years I worked as a protest police liaison, one memory in particular stands out. I once attended a protest where a group of women attempted to block a forestry road by lying together with linked arms and legs.
‘The ensuing melee as a group of male police attempted to pull apart the screaming women using pain compliance grips (moves to defeat the resistance of an arrestee, such as hyper-extending their wrist) was a chilling spectacle.
‘“Lock-on devices” – hardware like bicycle locks or handcuffs protesters use to secure themselves in their place of protest – would have provided a safer way of achieving the same result. And this was recently seen last week in Townsville.
‘… As a tool of non-violent civil-disobedience, using “lock-on” devices avoids risking group stand-offs with police, which can end up worse than rugby scrums. These devices certainly cause inconvenience, but it’s difficult to imagine how a person with one or both hands locked into a device could be anything but non-violent.
‘But the Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk recently proposed laws to outlaw the possession or use of protest lock-on devices. While no bill has yet been presented, media reports suggest severe penalties will be imposed, including prison terms and large fines.’
- ‘Lock-on devices’ are a symbol of non-violent protest, but they might soon be banned in Queensland »
- Protesters branded ‘extremist’ as Palaszczuk Government cracks down on road block tactics »
- Queensland government accused of ‘fabricating’ claims about climate activists »
- Australia has a long history of protests. Our rights should be better protected »
- Australia’s leaders are sitting on the sidelines. It’s up to the people to take a stand »
- Activists are using the climate emergency as a new legal defence to justify law-breaking »
- Extinction Rebellion protesters might be annoying. But they have a point »
- Queensland to fast-track laws to crack down on climate protesters »
- Queensland claims cabinet confidentiality to block release of climate protest details »
- Annastacia Palaszczuk is cracking down on protesters – she is likely correct about public sentiment »
- Queensland anti-protest laws ‘inherently disproportionate’, UN human rights experts say »
- Extinction Rebellion climate protester testing Human Rights Act on public nuisance charge »
- Harsher anti-protest laws targeting environmentalists are putting greed before green »
- ‘Draconian and undemocratic’: why criminalising climate protesters in Australia doesn’t actually work »
- New Victorian laws targeting peaceful protesters should send a chill up our spines »
- Violet Coco is not alone: the climate activists facing jail »
- How a handful of greying, greenie grannies became enemies of the state »
- ‘Rather die in jail than a nursing home’: climate activists show stiff resolve as they face Queensland court »