Monique Mann writes in The Conversation (15.8.18) that the broad and ill-defined new powers outlined in the Turnbull government’s new telecommunications bill are neither necessary nor proportionate – and contain significant scope for abuse.
‘The Australian government has released a draft of its long-awaited bill to provide law enforcement and security agencies with new powers to respond to the challenges posed by encryption.
‘According to the Department of Home Affairs, encryption already impacts 90% of Australian Security Intelligence Organisation’s (ASIO) priority cases, and 90% of data intercepted by the Australian Federal Police. The measures aim to counteract estimates that communications among terrorists and organised crime groups are expected to be entirely encrypted by 2020.
‘The Department of Home Affairs and ASIO can already access encrypted data with specialist decryption techniques – or at points where data are not encrypted. But this takes time. The new bill aims to speed up this process, but these broad and ill-defined new powers have significant scope for abuse.
‘The Department of Home Affairs argues this new framework will not compel communications providers to build systemic weaknesses or vulnerabilities into their systems. In other words, it is not a backdoor.
‘But it will require providers to offer up details about technical characteristics of their systems that could help agencies exploit weaknesses that have not been patched. It also includes installing software, and designing and building new systems.’
- The devil is in the detail of government bill to enable access to communications data »
- New data access bill shows we need to get serious about privacy with independent oversight of the law »
- Coalition’s surveillance laws give police power to access electronic devices »
- Apple and Facebook pressured to reveal terror suspects’ data »
- Tech giants to be targeted by anti-terror laws to help police access encrypted data »
- Australia should strengthen its privacy laws and remove exemptions for politicians »
- Turning ‘big brother’ surveillance into a helping hand to the homeless »
- The government’s encryption laws finally passed despite concerns over security »
- Australians want to support government use and sharing of data, but don’t trust their data will be safe »
- Why we need to fix encryption laws the tech sector says threaten Australian jobs »
- Encryption laws developed after little consultation with Australian tech companies, FOI documents reveal »
- Face to face with the future »
- Peter Dutton renews calls for ‘public debate’ over domestic surveillance powers »
- Australians’ personal freedoms could be under serious threat with the new ASIO bill »
- Major reform of surveillance laws proposed by review »
- Electronic surveillance law review won’t stop Border Force’s warrantless phone snooping »
- Big data and national security: a guide for Australian policymakers »
- Not Big Brother, but close: a surveillance expert explains some of the ways we’re all being watched, all the time »
- Proposed privacy reforms could help Australia play catch-up with other nations. But they fail to tackle targeted ads »