Henry Kha writes in The Conversation (28.10.19) that there have already been two recent inquires into the family court, but none of their recommendations have yet been rolled out.
‘Senator Pauline Hanson has recently argued fathers get a raw deal from the family court, saying mothers often make up accusations of family violence to deny fathers contact with their children. These unsupported claims perpetuate a form of victim blaming and may make women who have experienced family violence reluctant to speak out for fear of being disbelieved.
‘Yet this seems to be what’s pushing the latest parliamentary inquiry into family courts, of which Hanson is deputy chair.
‘It is, in fact, extremely rare for fathers to be denied contact with their children. This only happened in 3% of all court orders in 2014.
‘What’s more, there have already been two recent inquiries into family law, one ending as recent as April this year from the Australian Law Reform Commission. But the government has so far not implemented any of their combined 93 recommendations.
‘So while Hanson’s claims are wrong, there are still major issues the family court needs to fix to make sure the best interests of the child are promoted and victims of family violence are better protected.’
- The family court does need reform, but not the way Pauline Hanson thinks »
- Pauline Hanson sparks fury with claim domestic violence victims are lying to family court »
- The PM’s family court inquiry is a boneheaded gift to Pauline Hanson and men’s rights activists »
- ‘Parental alienation’: the debunked theory that women lie about violence is still used in court »
- Government commits funds to change men’s behaviour »
- More funding promised to men’s behaviour change programs, but we’re still not sure they work »
- Domestic violence: women’s safety advocates say Coalition is ignoring experts »
- To fix the family law system, we need to ask parents what really works »
- Law Council wants family law inquiry discontinued after One Nation live broadcast hearings »
- Court merger will be catastrophic for women and children »
- The government still wants a Family Court merger – new research shows why this is not the answer »
- Family Court merger set to pass after government wins over key senator »
- Family Court merger condemned by former judges and legal experts after legislation passed »
- ‘A devastating outcome’: Legal experts condemn Family Court merger »
- Whitlam’s Family Court legacy disappears »
- Another family law review, another shrug. Why conduct time-consuming inquiries if they go nowhere? »
- ‘They thought it was safe – but it wasn’t’ »
- Not a ‘relationship’: why the legal language of child abuse needs to change »
- ‘Quite irreparable damage’: child family violence survivors on how court silenced and retraumatised them »
- Family law overhaul to stop abusive partners from manipulating court system »
- Labor’s proposed family law overhaul makes some important changes, but omits others »