Sarah Martin reports in The Guardian (29.3.22) on Treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s 2022 federal budget, promising cash handouts and financial incentives months short of an election.
‘Josh Frydenberg is pegging his government’s re-election chances on a budget cash splash fuelled by a “remarkable” economic rebound, with $8.6bn promised for Australian households, and billions of dollars of new spending for the regions, defence and infrastructure.
‘As the government prepares to kickstart its campaign for a May election within days, Tuesday’s budget includes an extra tax cut for 10 million low and middle income workers worth up to $420, and a $250 one-off cash payment for pensioners and concession card holders aimed at softening the blow of rising inflation. These measures will cost a combined $5.6bn.
‘In addition, the government will also halve the fuel excise for six months – which is now set at 44 cents a litre – saving about $15 on the average price of a tank of petrol, at a cost to the budget of about $3bn.
‘… The budget documents show the underlying cash balance has improved $38.1bn in 2022-23, and by $114.6bn over the four years to 2025-26. But while the government has banked most of this to improve the budget bottom line, the total cost of policy decisions is $17.2bn next year and $30.4bn over the four years to 2025-26.’
- Federal budget 2022: Josh Frydenberg promises cash splash for households with billions on offer »
- Health budget tops $132bn as Treasury says new Covid wave likely to hit this winter »
- Budget papers show Morrison government plans to cut climate spending if it wins election »
- Redspice: budget ushers in Australia’s ‘biggest ever’ cybersecurity spend »
- Budget 2022: Frydenberg has spent big – but on the whole, responsibly »
- Josh Frydenberg’s budget is an extraordinary turnaround – but leaves a $40 billion problem »
- Budget expands deposit scheme for first home buyers: a second-best option, with risks down the road »
- A cost-of-living budget: cuts, spends, and everything you need to know at a glance »
- Cheaper fuel and one-off cost-of-living payments in federal government’s pre-election budget »
- Budget forecasts tax breaks for small businesses investing in technology and skills »
- What does the fuel excise cut mean? What happened to the beer excise cut? Five quick questions about the federal budget »
- Federal budget: $160 million for nature may deliver only pork and a fudge »
- Poor policy and short-sightedness: how the budget treats climate change and energy in the wake of disasters »
- Federal budget cuts to integrity bodies spark calls for independent funding »
- Budget 2022: $9.9 billion towards cyber security aims to make Australia a key ‘offensive’ cyber player »
- Budget 2022: the government spends big on its ‘khaki election’ strategy, but neglects diplomacy and other ‘soft’ power »
- Health budget 2022 spends a little on favoured interest groups but misses a chance for real reform »
- Is the budget good for women? The paid parental leave change takes us backwards and childcare costs were ignored »
- There’s $1.3 billion for women’s safety in the budget and it’s nowhere near enough »
- The budget hands out $21 billion for ‘regional Australia’, but a quarter of it is going to a single project in Queensland »
- The budget super giveaway that allows the already wealthy to amass even more tax-free »
- One issue matters more to top economists than any other this election: climate change »
View from The Hill: if money talks, the government has the megaphone out
Michelle Grattan writes in The Conversation (29.3.22) about the Coalition’s 2022 federal budget suggesting that it is ‘unashamedly’ designed to deliver voters plenty of pre-election sweeteners.
‘When Josh Frydenberg says his key cost-of-living budget measures are “temporary” and “targeted”, he’s precisely right, though the reasons are more opportunistic than he’d spruik publicly.
‘He says it’s all about giving help when it’s needed while not baking in long-term spending.
‘But actually, and equally, the measures are aimed squarely at the imminent election, and firmly directed to purchasing votes. If money talks, the government has taken up the megaphone.
‘This is a budget for the instant – unashamedly an election bribe, and unconcerned when that involves pursuing some poor policy.’
- View from The Hill: if money talks, the government has the megaphone out »
- Federal budget 2022: Winners and Losers »
- Cheaper petrol, cash handouts in Morrison government’s vote-buying budget »
- At this gravest of times the Coalition has served up an election budget designed simply to keep itself in power »
- Federal budget 2022: six graphs that reveal the sugar-hit election strategy »
- ‘Unprecedented’ regional infrastructure budget spend targets battleground seats »
- Petrol and tax cuts: budget showers voters with $8.6bn in one-off payments and sweeteners »
- Treasurer Josh Frydenberg rolls out the barrel in budget 2022 »
- Will you be better off after the budget? Maybe, but bad news is coming later »
- Coalition splashes $8.6b on election pitch to voters »
- The price of votes is going to be expensive »
- Sleight of hand: Frydenberg’s disappearing cash trick »
- The Tinkerbell budget: Clap if you believe it makes sense »
- ‘There’s going to be a reckoning’: Post-pandemic spending surges, with no end in sight »
- Who says it’s all about getting re-elected: PM defends Budget sweeteners »
- Budget 2022: The tax time bombs set to go off after the election »
- The 2022 budget is the yin to 2014’s yang – and just as likely to come true »
- The amazing thing about the 2022 budget? How clearly it reveals the government’s death throes »
- What will the fuel excise cut save you? Not as much as the Treasurer says »
- Poll: Coalition cash splash leaves voters cold as just a quarter say budget will be good for them »
- Budget winners and losers: a guide to who’s a Morrison mate and who’s not »
- Renters spend 10 times as much on housing as petrol. Where’s their cost-of-living relief? »
- The Coalition is guaranteeing essential services and lower tax. We can’t have both »
Labor’s budget reply goes big on aged care, similar on much else
Stephen Bartos writes in The Conversation (31.3.22) about the federal budget reply speech from Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese, highlighting Labor’s promises to boost aged care spending.
‘In most years, the opposition leader’s budget reply passes virtually unnoticed. By convention, it is delivered two days after the budget.
‘It’s different when an election is imminent. Then it becomes a statement of priorities about what the opposition would do differently if it wins government.
‘There is hardly ever a difference between government and opposition on the broad directions of spending and taxing – and for that matter, rarely much difference on tax and spending between one budget and the next.
‘… Opposition leader Anthony Albanese’s Thursday night speech in reply is no exception. Differences between the parties lie not in macroeconomic settings or in the amount of spending, but in what it is spent on. The centrepiece is an aged care package with five parts.’
- Labor’s budget reply goes big on aged care, similar on much else »
- Anthony Albanese offers $2.5 billion plan to ‘fix crisis in aged care’ »
- Albanese zeroes in on aged care sector ahead of the only poll that counts »
- Budget reply speech: Anthony Albanese pledges $2.5bn extra for struggling aged care system »
- Labor commits to fixing aged care ‘crisis’ as Anthony Albanese sets sights on election »
- Budget reply has merit, but how would Labor pay for its plans? »
- Labor pledges $2.5 billion for aged care, cheaper childcare »
- Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese says federal budget ‘a plan for an election, not a plan for Australia’s future’ »
- Labor’s plans for aged care are targeted but fall short of what’s needed »
- ‘We must act’: Aged care body calls for $4b annual wages injection »
- Labor flags further cost of living support if elected and attacks ‘wasteful spending’ in Coalition budget »
- We won’t be spendthrifts in federal budget, warns PM »