James Morley writes in The Conversation (5.4.16) about data which refute the oft-repeated ‘truism’ that the conservative parties in Australia make a better fist of managing the national economy.
‘Conventional wisdom holds that conservative politicians are more prudent stewards of the economy. These politicians are often happy to reinforce this view by citing their business acumen and denigrating the experience – or lack thereof – of their opponents.
‘Think of Mitt Romney as multi-millionaire businessman versus Barack Obama, former community leader. Donald Trump also highlights his business “experience”, although his track record suggests he’s done far worse at managing his father’s wealth than a monkey throwing darts at The Wall Street Journal.
‘In Australia, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has positioned himself as a successful manager of economic transition in advance of the next election.
‘But what if we were to take the business metaphor seriously and hold politicians to account with a performance review in terms of “measurable outcomes”? Would there actually be any evidence for the view that conservatives are better managers of the economy?’
- The idea that conservatives are better economic managers simply does not stand up »
- Pensioners and families: who is worse off under Coalition budgets? »
- Trick question: who’s the better economic manager? »
- The Coalition banks on the myth they are better economic managers than Labor, but facts are eroding the slogan »
- Australia’s economic figures are a nonsense – and voters should not believe the Coalition’s spin »
- A century-old double standard: like Labor leaders before him, Albanese is being told he can’t manage money »