TJ Ryan Foundation Research Associate, David Peetz, writes in The Conversation (26.6.20) about the federal government’s proposed changes to higher education fee structures in a supposed attempt to make students more ‘job ready’ through degree choice.
‘The future of jobs has been used to justify the major changes to university education announced last week. Fees for courses that, according to the government, lead to jobs with a great future will fall, while those with a poor future will rise.
‘But can the government predict the jobs of the future? And do proposed fee changes match those jobs that will grow?
‘In the research I have done on the future of work, several things are clear. The further you look ahead, the less useful the present is as a guide. This is especially the case in employment because, in a quickly changing world, technology is hard to predict and changing consumption patterns even harder.
‘… A more plausible explanation for the changes to university fees is that the marketable skills argument is just a cover for another agenda.
‘Critical thinking is a key skill for the future, but one can’t help but think it is not something the government wants encouraged.’
- Can government actually predict the jobs of the future? »
- Universities warn funding overhaul will put quality of education in Australia ‘at risk’ »
- Dan Tehan’s threat to police university enrolments can’t plug the holes in the Coalition’s logic »
- Cheaper courses won’t help graduates get jobs – they need good careers advice and links with employers »
- An open letter to Australia’s Education Minister Dan Tehan – signed by 73 senior professors »
- ‘Universities are not corporations’: 600 Australian academics call for change to uni governance structures »
- Nationals demand changes to controversial university fee hikes »
- Nationals revolt over the government’s proposed university fee changes »
- Australian universities plead for fee rises to be scaled back and places increased »
- What are universities for? If mainly teaching, can they sack academics for not meeting research targets? »
- Job-ready graduates changes loom as last straw for emerging researchers »
- If we want brilliant English, history or geography teachers, why are we making humanities courses so costly? »
- 1 in 4 unemployed Australians has a degree. How did we get to this point? »
- Intensive support: Budget to offer to retrain Australians in new skills »
- In this ‘job-ready’ era, it’s worth looking at how a US-style broader education can benefit uni students »
- Fair access to university depends on much more than making students ‘job-ready’ »
- The inequity of Job-ready Graduates for students must be brought to a quick end. Here’s how »
- ‘Everybody is confused’: Humanities students hit with surprise fee rises »
- University fees are poised to change – a new system needs to consider how much courses cost and what graduates can earn »
Elect the vice-chancellor!
TJ Ryan Foundation Research Associate, David Peetz, writes in Inside Story (15.10.20) about the Coalition’s changes to university fees, wondering if university governance is getting in the way of a healthy higher education system.
‘Many people blame federal education minister Dan Tehan for the parlous condition universities find themselves in. But it would be unfair to ignore the contributions of many other people over the years. Among many candidates, the biggest culprit is Brendan Nelson, who was education minister a decade and a half ago. That’s not because of the big cuts in funding he oversaw. More important were the changes to university governance he forced on universities.
‘… This change in governance is key to understanding universities’ lack of effective resistance to years of government measures, including the recent changes to fees, that clearly make students and staff worse off.’
- Elect the vice-chancellor! »
- 3 flaws in Job-Ready Graduates package will add to the turmoil in Australian higher education »
- Universities can help Australia’s economic recovery, but that’s all at risk if the ‘job-ready graduates’ bill passes »
- Punitive fees and job cuts: Australian universities have been transformed into giant corporations »
- Vital Signs: this university funding crisis was always coming – COVID-19 just accelerated it »
- Universities are cutting hundreds of jobs – they, and the government, can do better »
- Universities, a shared crisis, and two centre-right governments »
- The decline of universities, where students are customers and academics itinerant workers »
- Universities should change the way they measure success »
- Keeping public priorities in public universities »
- How do we value universities? »
- Who do universities serve? »
- How competing for students will transform universities »
- ‘Failure of leadership’: NSW MPs urge review of $1 million vice-chancellor pay »
- 2 out of 3 members of university governing bodies have no professional expertise in the sector. There’s the making of a crisis »
- Why big university surpluses underscore the need to reform how they are funded and governed »
- As women decide Australia’s new leaders, what is going on with academic leadership? »
- The Universities Accord will plan for the next 30 years: what big issues must it address? »