Rethinking how we assess learning in schools

Geoff Masters writes in The Conversation (7.2.17) about how our current way of assessing school students doesn’t let them see the progress they are making over extended periods of time.

‘There is a major flaw in the way we currently assess school students. By labelling them as either “good” or “poor” learners based on their overall grades at the end of each year, students have no clear idea whether they are making progress over extended periods of time.

‘We need to move away from focusing on what grade a child will get at the end of a year, to assessing the progress that students make over time.

‘… One of the best ways to build students’ confidence as learners is to help them see the progress they are making over extended periods of time.

‘A focus on monitoring learning encourages a long-term perspective. Rather than being defined only in terms of year-level expectations, successful learning is defined as the progress or growth that students make over time.

‘Under this approach, every student is expected to make excellent progress every year towards the achievement of high standards – regardless of their current levels of attainment.’

The TJRyan Foundation does not guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of any information or material available on this website. The TJRyan Foundation reserves the right to change information or material on this website at any time without notice. Links from this site to external, non-TJRyan Foundation websites should not be construed as implying any relationship with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by the TJR Foundation, nor any commercial relationship with the owners of any external site. Should any TJRyan research project be funded by an individual or organisation the source of funding will be stated beside the research report. In all other cases contributions are provided on a pro bono basis.
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get notified about new articles

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.