Stacey Fox and Megan O’Connell write in The Conversation (25.5.16) about the ambiguous policy positions of both major political parties in regards to early years education and childcare services, which they argue are critical platforms for children’s later learning at school.
‘Spending on early years education seems to be a tough sell for politicians.
‘A significant number of Australians, both politicians and voters, see “childcare” as a service to help parents get back to work, despite growing recognition that early education is important for children’s learning and development.
‘The discussion tends to focus on household budgets and the ability of mum (mostly) to go back to work.
‘While these are important issues that families face every day, we don’t treat school in this manner – we don’t make decisions about whether children can go to school based on how much their parents work and earn and, likewise, this shouldn’t factor into decisions about young children accessing quality early learning.’
- Why is childcare such a hard sell in the federal election? »
- ‘Insulting’ and ‘degrading’: budget funding for childcare may help families but educators are still being paid pennies »
- Politicians criticising women for ‘outsourcing’ parenting need a reality check. Here it is »
- It takes a village: why sending your kid to childcare isn’t ‘outsourcing parenting’ »
- Nearly 40% of Australian families can’t ‘afford’ childcare »
- Mapping Australia’s childcare blackspots »
- If governments were really concerned about tax and the cost of living they would cut the cost of childcare »
- High childcare fees, low pay for staff and a lack of places pose a huge policy challenge »
- Government announces inquiry into childcare costs, while Chalmers promises ‘conversation’ about budget challenges »
- Better to spend on child care than paid parental leave »