TJ Ryan Foundation Research Associate, John Quiggin, writes in Inside Story (6.4.21) about former chief scientist Alan Finkel’s advice for the Morrison Coalition government on how it can shift on climate.
‘Battered by weeks of revelations about the treatment of women, and with the vaccine rollout falling far behind schedule, the federal government appears to have forgotten about climate change. But Scott Morrison faces some tough decisions over the next few weeks.
‘On 22 April, Joe Biden will hold a virtual climate summit aimed at persuading world leaders to take more ambitious action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The US president has correctly identified climate change as an “existential threat,” and his US$2 trillion infrastructure package includes substantial investment in renewable energy and electric vehicles. His climate ambassador, John Kerry, has identified Australia as one of the holdouts, linking us to the Bolsonaro regime in Brazil.
‘… Everyone outside the lunatic fringe of the government’s backbench knows that the final outcome of this process will be a commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. We can do this voluntarily or we can wait to have it forced on us by the trade sanctions being prepared by the European Union and foreshadowed by the United States. Morrison has already inched towards this position by acknowledging that it would be desirable to reach net zero preferably by 2050.
‘It would make political as well as economic and environmental sense to make the commitment in time for Biden’s summit. At best, it might shift the domestic focus from the scandals besetting the government. Even if that doesn’t happen, it could hardly do any more damage than the daily run of disasters. Some backbenchers might shift to the crossbench, as Craig Kelly has already done and Andrew Laming will probably be forced to do before long. But they won’t vote to bring down the government, and Morrison has survived minority government before.’
- Finkel’s road to zero »
- ‘Prosperity and low emissions’: Former chief scientist backs climate policy »
- Former chief scientist spruiks Australia’s green tech on world stage »
- Australia is at a crossroads in the global hydrogen race – and one path looks risky »
- Grattan on Friday: As Morrison struggles with 2050, the climate leaders up the ante for 2030 »
- Australia has been talking up its climate credentials – but do the claims stack up? »
- More reasons for optimism on climate change than we’ve seen for decades: 2 climate experts explain »
- Global reset on climate action leaves Scott Morrison looking like yesterday’s man »
- Alan Kohler: Scott Morrison, the Murdochs and the crime of the century »
- Climate change: Australia urged to set up climate action during London G7 talks »
- Ignore, defend and pretend: Scott Morrison’s G7 climate strategy is embarrassing »
- Wealthy countries’ climate shift leaves Australia isolated from closest allies »
- The Nationals need clarity on what they want from a net zero climate deal »
- Towards net zero: practical policies to reduce transport emissions »
- Getting from here to net zero »
- Policy dance on net zero commitments suits both Nationals and Liberals »
- Towards net zero: a practical plan for Australia’s governments »
- How will net zero shape the future? With job gains and losses. It’s inevitable »
- How net zero could deliver five per cent boost to Queensland’s wealth »
- Alan Finkel: This energy revolution is hard – really hard – but it’s doable »
- Net zero is the goal, but will chaos in the regions delay energy transition goals?
- Australia finally has a Net Zero Authority – here’s what should top its agenda
- ‘No time to waste’: getting Australian homes off gas crucial for meeting net zero targets, report says
- We need to decarbonise our electricity supply, and quickly – Alan Finkel shows how green energy can be a reality, and bring economic benefits
- Net zero by 2035 would be ‘monumentally’ hard for Australia to achieve. But these experts argue it’s critical
- The road is long and time is short, but Australia’s pace towards net zero is quickening
- Worried economists call for a carbon price, a tax on coal exports, and ‘green tariffs’ to get Australia on the path to net zero
- How could Australia actually get to net zero? Here’s how
5 reasons why the Morrison government needs a net-zero target, not just a flimsy plan
TJ Ryan Foundation Research Associate, Ian Lowe, writes in The Conversation (6.10.21) that reaching net-zero emissions in Australia will require intense policy focus, private investment and clear accountability.
‘Prime Minister Scott Morrison may be warming to a net-zero emissions target by 2050, but Australia is still far from adopting it – largely thanks to resistance from the National Party.
‘Should Morrison fail to get the policy over the line, he will no doubt point to the government’s low-emissions technology roadmap as evidence the government still has a climate plan.
‘But a vague plan is not enough. That was confirmed by a recent analysis showing Australia’s climate policies are insufficient and have inevitably led to investment in new fossil fuel projects.
‘Reaching net-zero emissions will require intense policy focus, private investment and clear accountability – conditions only a firm numerical target can provide. Here are five reasons the Morrison government must, at a minimum, set a target of net-zero emisisons by 2050.’
- 5 reasons why the Morrison government needs a net-zero target, not just a flimsy plan »
- The government’s embrace of ‘clean hydrogen’ helps no one but the fossil fuel industry »
- Calls to phase out fossil fuel subsidies after speculation about net-zero emissions target »
- Scott Morrison is the accidental architect of a carbon tax – whether he likes it or not »
- Think Morrison was wrong about electric cars and weekends? Wait till you hear him on emissions »
- European carbon border tax is a warning to Australia to clean up or pay the price »
- Today’s decisions lock in industry emissions for decades – here’s how to get them right »
- Covid’s message for carbon reduction »
- The net-zero bandwagon is gathering steam, and resistant MPs are about to be run over »
- View from The Hill: Barnaby Joyce keeps his political hands clean on the road to net zero target »
- Nationals won’t back net zero ‘unless it’s right for the regions’, Bridget McKenzie says »
- Towards net zero: practical policies to offset carbon emissions »
- Government not on track for net zero by 2050 »
- Investors could shun Australia without 2050 net zero commitment, RBA warns »
- Fossil fuel production to soar in face of emissions pledges, United Nations report says »
- Australia could become a net negative emissions economy. The technology already exists »
- Australia’s refusal to sign a global methane pledge exposes flaws in the term ‘net-zero’ »
- The government’s net-zero modelling shows winners, we’ve found losers as well »
- Net zero by 2050 will hit a major timing problem technology can’t solve. We need to talk about cutting consumption »
- Experts say the net zero concept is often used to delay taking action against emissions »
- Australia needs to reduce emissions to net zero by 2038 to do ‘fair share’ to contain global heating, analysis shows
- Why Australia urgently needs a climate plan and a Net Zero National Cabinet Committee to implement it
- The human factor: why Australia’s net zero transition risks failing unless it is fair