Samantha Hepburn writes in The Conversation (15.2.18) that, with pressure mounting on the state and federal governments over approvals for the Adani coal mine project, the Turnbull Government considered prosecuting Adani’s potential environmental negligence over the history of its Australian CEO.
‘It was reported this week that the federal Environment Department declined to prosecute Adani for failing to disclose that its Australian chief executive, Jeyakumar Janakaraj, was formerly the director of operations at a Zambian copper mine when it discharged toxic pollutants into a major river. Under the federal Environmental Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act, Adani is required to reveal the environmental history of its chief executive officers, and the federal report found Adani “may have been negligent”.
‘The revelations come as Adani faces down the Queensland government in the planning and environment court, over allegations the company concealed the full amount of coal-laden water discharged into the fragile Caley Valley Wetlands last year.
‘These concerns highlight some fundamental problems with the existing regulatory framework surrounding the long term utility and effectiveness of environmental conditions in upholding environmental protections for land impacted by mining projects.
‘… While the Queensland Labor government considers whether to increase the regulatory pressures on Adani, by subjecting them to further EPBC Act triggers such as the water resource trigger or the implementation of a new climate change trigger, perhaps the more fundamental question is whether these changes will ultimately improve environmental protection in the absence of stronger transparency and accountability and more robust management and enforcement processes for environmental conditions attached to mining projects.’
- Latest twist in the Adani saga reveals shortcomings in environmental approvals »
- Government considered prosecuting Adani over CEO’s links to company convicted over environmental disaster »
- Why Adani won’t die »
- Adani plans to protect desert springs are worthless, water experts say »
- Adani says it still needs a loan for rail line if coalmine is to go ahead »
- Adani granted 20 per cent boost to annual coal exports through Abbot Point terminal »
- Adani water project bypasses full environmental impact assessment against advice »
- Landmark Rocky Hill ruling could pave the way for more courts to choose climate over coal »
- Opportunity knocks, at a cost »
- Labor given new legal advice that it could revoke Adani approvals »
- Adani facing prosecution for allegedly providing false information in Carmichael mine report »
- Adani pleads guilty to giving ‘false or misleading documents to an administering authority’, fined $20k »
- Misled, conflicted and wedged: Study reveals how mining approvals have failed »
- Times have changed: why the environment minister is being forced to reconsider climate-related impacts of pending fossil fuel approvals »
- Albanese government approves first new coalmine since taking power