TJ Ryan Foundation Research Associate, John Quiggin, writes in The Conversation
(10.3.22) about the recent devastating floods to hit southeast Queensland and northern New South Wales. The author reminds that, while ‘one in 1,000 years’-style descriptions apply to probabilities that don’t change, the likelihood of severe floods is in fact increasing.
‘Australia’s catastrophic east coast floods have been described by the NSW premier as a “one in 1,000-year event, a term that has created a great deal of confusion. Lengthy explanations that these terms are not the same as “occurring 1,000 years apart” or “once every 1,000 years” have only added to the confusion.
‘The simplest explanation is that the actual meaning of “one in 1,000 years” is “having a probability of 0.1 per cent in any given year” (1 in 1,000), which raises the question: why don’t people simply say that?
‘The main reason is that these terms date back to a time when most people didn’t think in terms of probabilities, and even those who did were confused about how they worked. These days we interact with probabilities all the time.
‘… But the probability of a severe flood changes over time as the relationship between the components that make up the weather system change. Whether a flood has occurred gives us evidence about that change. This makes it no longer helpful to refer to a severe flood as “one in x years” event.’
- One in 1,000 years? Old flood probabilities no longer hold water »
- Premier says response to ‘unprecedented’ flood will be investigated »
- Build back better: Mayor calls for home design rethink in wake of devastating floods »
- The floods have killed at least 21 Australians. Adapting to a harsher climate is now a life-or-death matter »
- Whether people prepare for natural disasters depends on how the message is sent »
- Weather forecasts won’t save us – we must pre-empt monster floods years before they hit »
- Under-resourced and undermined: as floods hit south-west Sydney, our research shows councils aren’t prepared »
- Floods left thousands without power. Microgrids could help communities weather the next disaster »
- Distress can linger after disasters like floods. A mix of personality, family and community gives us clues »
- First come floods, then domestic violence. We need to prepare for the next inevitable crisis »
- Scott Morrison’s tone-deaf leadership is the last thing traumatised flood victims need. Here are two ways he can do better »
- Are the devastating floods a continuum in Australia? »
- You were warned: Emergency chiefs want action on climate change »
- As floods worsen, some say it is time to rethink how Queenslanders build for the future »
- South-east Queensland’s floods were labelled a ‘once-in-100-year’ event, so what does that actually mean? »
- Why can floods like those in the Northern Rivers come in clusters? »
- Our flood predictions are getting worse as the climate changes. We have to understand how hills shape floods »
- Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines and Australia. What can we learn from the world’s devastating floods? »
- Effects of climate change such as flooding makes existing disadvantages for Indigenous communities so much worse »
- As New South Wales reels, many are asking why it’s flooding in places where it’s never flooded before »
- Climate change: We’ve entered the era of unnatural disasters. Here’s what we must do »
- As heatwaves and floods hit cities worldwide, these places are pioneering solutions »
- ‘Build back better’ sounds great in theory, but does the government really know what it means in practice? »
- Flood protection based on historical records is flawed – we need a risk model fit for climate change