« Back to Publications

The 10 stuff-ups we all make when interpreting research

Will Grant and Rod Lamberts (The Conversation, 3.10.14) discuss some common mistakes people make when trying to interpret new research:

1 ‘Wait! That’s just one study’;

2. ‘Significant doesn’t mean important’;

3. ‘And effect size doesn’t mean useful’;

4. ‘Are you judging the extremes by the majority?’;

5. ‘Did you maybe even want to find that effect?’;

6. ‘Were you tricked by sciencey snake oil?’;

7. ‘Qualities aren’t quantities and quantities aren’t qualities’;

8. ‘Models by definition are not perfect representations of reality’;

9. ‘Context matters’;

10. ‘And just because it’s peer reviewed that doesn’t make it right’.

The TJRyan Foundation does not guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of any information or material available on this website. The TJRyan Foundation reserves the right to change information or material on this website at any time without notice. Links from this site to external, non-TJRyan Foundation websites should not be construed as implying any relationship with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by the TJR Foundation, nor any commercial relationship with the owners of any external site. Should any TJRyan research project be funded by an individual or organisation the source of funding will be stated beside the research report. In all other cases contributions are provided on a pro bono basis.
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get notified about new articles

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.