Peter Newman writes in The Conversation (18.7.16) about a new proposal for a high speed rail route to run between Melbourne and Sydney, seeking to fund the project without government investment.
‘As an urban rail activist, academic and commentator, including a spell on Infrastructure Australia, I can say from the start I was delighted that we have a consortium prepared to have a go at high-speed rail using value capture.
‘Consolidated Land and Rail Australia (CLARA) is the first group in Australia to suggest that a major rail option can be funded without government capital. This fits with what we have been saying for a number of years (for example, the entrepreneur rail model).
‘It is not just a way of bringing financing groups like superannuation funds into such major infrastructure projects where governments have no hope of finding the cash, but it is also a better way: it inherently integrates with land development opportunities to make less car-dependent cities.
‘High-speed rail is needed. We are the last major developed area without it.’
- High-speed rail? At $200 billion we’d better get it right »
- Fast train: plenty of backers for $200 billion rail plan with scant detail »
- Let’s get moving with the affordable medium-speed alternatives to the old dream of high-speed rail »
- Labor to promise $1bn for east coast high-speed rail line »
- We can halve train travel times between our cities by moving to faster rail »
- Regional cities beware – fast rail might lead to disadvantaged dormitories, not booming economies »
- Too good to be true? Australia’s high-speed rail dream leaves a bitter taste »
- High-speed trains to nowhere: Australia’s long-running rail fail »
- SEQ needs a Fast Train network not just ideas, Olympic bid MP says »
- Look beyond a silver bullet train for stimulus »
- High-speed rail on Australia’s east coast would increase emissions for up to 36 years »
- Don’t abandon plans for high-speed rail in Australia – just look at all the benefits »
- Inland rail visionary slams what his project has become »
- Residents say the multi-billion-dollar Inland Rail will devastate Queensland’s Scenic Rim »
- Inland Rail set to flourish elsewhere while Queensland ponders destination »
- What a spectacular failure of infrastructure policy is Inland Rail »
- The case for high-speed rail is bigger than business »
- ‘Poorly planned’: Labor to rethink $14b Inland Rail project if elected »