How changing times made Australia’s political leaders more disposable

Rodney Tiffen writes in The Conversation (16.2.17) about the way that ‘times have changed’ in the Australian political context. The author argues that the frequency of party coups against sitting prime ministers and other party leaders exemplifies a ‘new reality’.

‘In the decades after the second world war, losing an election was not necessarily grounds for a leader being replaced or challenged. Federal Labor leaders Bert Evatt and Arthur Calwell and Victorians Clive Stoneham and Clyde Holding all lost three successive elections while remaining in place. In contrast, only one party leader since the 1980s (Rob Borbidge, Queensland Nationals) has survived to suffer three or more electoral defeats.

‘Until at least the 1970s, the major route to party leadership was through seniority, and patience was considered a virtue. … The emphasis on seniority and patience had its costs. It denied some of the most able people their chance to lead.

‘The way times have changed is exemplified in the frequency of party coups against sitting prime ministers.’

The TJRyan Foundation does not guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of any information or material available on this website. The TJRyan Foundation reserves the right to change information or material on this website at any time without notice. Links from this site to external, non-TJRyan Foundation websites should not be construed as implying any relationship with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by the TJR Foundation, nor any commercial relationship with the owners of any external site. Should any TJRyan research project be funded by an individual or organisation the source of funding will be stated beside the research report. In all other cases contributions are provided on a pro bono basis.
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get notified about new articles

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.