Margaret Gardner writes in The Conversation (28.2.18) that the federal government’s freeze on university funding not only limits opportunities for students, but it puts limitations on the communities that universities serve, on the economy, and on business interested in forming collaborations.
‘When Australia decided in 2009 to uncap university places, educational opportunity was to be matched to the knowledge demands of the future. It was a bold advance – and one supported by both sides of politics.
‘Since that time, we have seen 55% growth in enrolments from the poorest fifth of Australian households, 48% growth for regional and rural students, 89% for Indigenous students and 106% growth for students with a disability.
‘This expansion of opportunity is why we cannot accept the freeze on university funding inflicted last December. That freeze inflicts a cut of A$2.2 billion on Australia’s universities and the communities they serve.
‘The university funding freeze is really a cap on opportunity. And it will limit the share of the highly-skilled, well-paid jobs in our economy that can be done by qualified Australians in the decades ahead.
‘… So when we hear commentators suggest that university education is now extended to too many people, we should be clear such views are really about reducing opportunity for some Australians.
‘Whose children, relatives or partners are they suggesting should not have this chance? Not only are such views out of step with our global economic competitors, they’re also out of step with the views of the overwhelming majority of Australians.’
- Margaret Gardner: freezing university funding is out of step with the views of most Australians »
- How philanthropy could change higher education funding »
- No, university is not a waste of time and money »
- Australia doesn’t have too many universities. Here’s why »
- University funding debates should be broadened to reflect their democratic purpose »
- Cuts to university funding will cost the country billions, study claims »
- Australian tertiary education funding is not as low as it seems in OECD metrics »
- Three charts on: how uncapped university funding actually boosted Indigenous student numbers »
- Government funding will be tied to uni performance from 2020: what does this mean, and what are the challenges? »
- Unis relying on overseas students to ‘balance the books’ after funding cuts »
- Australia’s tertiary education spending grew while commentators cried otherwise: we explain in 6 charts »
- Five Australian universities get the bulk of philanthropic donations »
- As universities face losing 1 in 10 staff, COVID-driven cuts create 4 key risks »
- Wage theft and casual work are built into university business models »
- Which universities are best placed financially to weather COVID? »
- Split system »
- Universities warn more jobs will be lost »
- Australian university staff say they were blacklisted after speaking out on underpayment »
- Australian universities brace for ‘ugly’ 2022 after budget cuts »
- Big-spending ‘recovery budget’ leaves universities out in the cold »
- The government’s university funding cuts will bring lasting damage »
- Brain drain: International students more than cash cows and cheap labour »
- Australia’s international education market share is shrinking fast. Recovery depends on unis offering students a better deal »
- Australia’s $40 billion question: Will international students return? »
- Universities’ wage theft as a business model must be stamped out »
- Unis offered as few as 1 in 100 casuals permanent status in 2021. Why aren’t conversion rules working for these staff? »
- Universities had record job losses, but not as many as feared – and the worst may be over »
- Universities are ‘the next Uber’: Stories from the coalface of scientific research in Australia »
- ‘Grand compromise’ at Western Sydney University hailed as answer to tertiary sector’s reliance on insecure work »
- NTEU wage theft report »
- Inside Australia’s university wage theft machine
- Uncapping uni places for Indigenous students is a step in the right direction, but we must do much more
Why is the Australian government letting universities suffer?
Gavin Moodie writes in The Conversation (19.5.20) about the federal government’s refusal to extend Covid-19 employment support measures to universities and their staff, suggesting it forms part of the wider ‘culture wars’ backlash against the higher education sector.
‘On March 30, the federal government announced JobKeeper – a A$130 billion wage subsidy for employees to limit the economic devastation of COVID-19. Employers are eligible for the A$1,500 a fortnight payment to staff if the business’ revenue had fallen over a specified period by 30% or 50%, depending on their size.
‘This excluded most universities. But the government soon announced the threshold for JobKeeper would be lowered to 15% for charities, giving hope to universities, which are not-for-profit organisations. That is, until the government clarified “this lower turnover decline test does not apply to universities”.
‘And while some universities were still eligible by their calculations, the government made two other changes to JobKeeper that seemed targeted at ensuring university staff couldn’t get any help from the government. This is despite Universities Australia’s estimate around 21,000 jobs will be lost.
‘While the government has provided some help to universities in the form of its higher education relief package – which guarantees funding for domestic students already budgeted for – it won’t fill the gap in revenue lost due to international students.
‘This will likely result in mass staff lay-offs and may risk some universities’ financial viability. It will also severely curtail Australia’s research capacity. So, why has the Australian government taken successive steps specifically to exclude universities from its business continuity funding?’
- Why is the Australian government letting universities suffer? »
- Australian universities angry at ‘final twist of the knife’ excluding them from jobkeeper »
- Pay cuts to keep jobs: the tertiary education union’s deal with universities explained »
- More than 70% of academics at some universities are casuals. They’re losing work and are cut out of JobKeeper »
- Australian universities could lose $19 billion in the next 3 years. Our economy will suffer with them »
- For most universities, there’s little point to the government’s COVID-19 assistance package »
- How universities came to rely on international students »
- University upheaval: ‘If people feel safe, we’ll see the students come back’ »
- Australian universities to close campuses and shed thousands of jobs as revenue plummets due to Covid-19 crisis »
- The four-and-a-half-decade higher education squeeze »
- Fee cuts for nursing and teaching but big hikes for law and humanities in package expanding university places »
- Cashed-up university sector accused of hypocrisy over mass casualisation of workforce, job losses »
- Do Australians care about unis? They’re now part of our social wage, so we should »
- Universities in crisis? They’ve been there before, and found a way out »
- Our unis do need international students and must choose between the high and low roads »
- Challenging the casualisation of academia »
- More than 17,000 jobs lost at Australian universities during Covid pandemic »
- COVID hit casual academics hard. Here are 5 ways to produce a better deal for unis and staff »
- Shunned and overlooked, universities face a bleak future »
- The 2021-22 budget has added salt to universities’ COVID wounds »
- Universities are being ‘left to bleed’ after 2021 federal budget snub, Nobel Laureate ANU head says »
- Tanya Plibersek says the Morrison government treats higher education as a subversive enemy »
- Labor to repair ‘economic vandalism’ inflicted on Australia’s universities, Tanya Plibersek says »
- Why the international education crisis will linger long after students return to Australia »
- Labor offers extra university places, but more radical change is needed »
- As international students return, let’s not return to the status quo of isolation and exploitation »
- Here’s what the government and universities can do about the crisis of insecure academic work »
- Scientific researchers are stressed, burning out and giving up »
- Insecure work in Australian higher education must end now »
- Australian unis could not function without casual staff: it is time to treat them as ‘real’ employees
- University staff strike over insecure work as ‘anger and discontent’ builds on campus
- Australian universities report finds quality of education eroded by ‘long-term underfunding’
- The Universities Accord draft contains ‘spiky’ ideas, but puts a question mark over the spikiest one of all