« Back to Publications

Time to rethink NAPLAN?

Anne Susskind questions what effect Naplan is having on children in her article in The Guardian (22.11.16):

‘When Naplan started in 2008, it was voluntary and parents were assured that it would be used only as a diagnostic tool, a convenient mass instrument to determine educational achievement and help students in need. That was the premise, the promise.

‘But the worst always seems to transpire in education, especially in the age of the internet, as we lurch backwards, anchors gone. Normalisation of the awful, the frog in the boiling water, and before we know it, this will be another tool wielded by floundering politicians. Another tool to classify, another lowest common denominator marker in the unfair race in which some schools and students already start out with such obvious advantages.’

The TJRyan Foundation does not guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of any information or material available on this website. The TJRyan Foundation reserves the right to change information or material on this website at any time without notice. Links from this site to external, non-TJRyan Foundation websites should not be construed as implying any relationship with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by the TJR Foundation, nor any commercial relationship with the owners of any external site. Should any TJRyan research project be funded by an individual or organisation the source of funding will be stated beside the research report. In all other cases contributions are provided on a pro bono basis.
Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get notified about new articles

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.