‘It seems that the one certainty about any clean energy target set by the present government is that it will not drive sufficient progress towards a clean, affordable, reliable energy future. At best, it will provide a safety net to ensure that some cleanish energy supply capacity is built.
‘Future federal governments will have to expand or complement any target set by this government, which is compromised by its need to pander to its rump. So a cleanish energy target will not provide investment certainty for a carbon-emitting power station unless extraordinary guarantees are provided. These would inevitably be challenged in parliament and in the courts.
‘Even then, the unstoppable evolution of our energy system would leave an inflexible baseload power station without a market for much of the electricity it could generate. Instead, we must rely on a cluster of other strategies to do the heavy lifting of driving our energy market forward.
‘… While sorting out wholesale markets is important, we need to remember that this is just part of the energy bill. Energy waste, network operations, retailing and pricing structures such as high fixed charges must also be addressed. Some useful steps are being taken, but much more work is needed.’
- A cleanish energy target gets us nowhere »
- Tony Abbott steps up pressure on Malcolm Turnbull, could cross floor over clean energy target »
- A clean energy target is not ‘unconscionable’, Tony Abbott. Wrecking climate policy is »
- Can two clean energy targets break the deadlock of energy and climate policy? »
- Turnbull is pursuing ‘energy certainty’ but what does that actually mean? »
- Baffled by baseload? Dumbfounded by dispatchables? Here’s a glossary of the energy debate »
- Renewables roll-out going at a cracking pace, but we still may miss 2030 target