Megan Davis writes in The Conversation (25.1.21) about the debate over the contentious date of Australia Day, and how it obscures an achievable path for meaningful national change through the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament.
‘We are on the eve of the nation’s annual ritual of celebrating the arrivals, while not formally recognising the ancient peoples who were dispossessed.
‘Each year the tensions spill over, rendering Australia Day/Invasion Day/Survival Day a protest as much as a celebration. But there is a quiet process underway, aimed at achieving substantive recognition of the First Nations that has so far eluded Australia.
‘… This is now an opportunity for Australians and First Nations peoples to make their views clearly heard. It is only an interim report, and it requires the feedback of many.
‘All Australians want to find a way through the annual debates about Captain Cook, the First Fleet and national identity, to a more inclusive and nuanced narrative of who we are.’
- Toxicity swirls around January 26, but we can change the nation with a Voice to parliament »
- An Indigenous ‘Voice’ must be enshrined in our Constitution. Here’s why »
- Indigenous Voice to Parliament would create much-needed dialogue with government: Tom Calma »
- There is no room for error with a First Nations Voice »
- Government poised to release Indigenous Voice options »
- A rightful place, from colonisation to reconciliation »
- Amid the false history over 26 January, it pays to consider what Australia was really built on »
- Is the Voice already being muted? »
- The Sami’s voice »
- Indigenous recognition is more than a Voice to Government – it’s a matter of political equality »
- Government’s process for First Nations Voice shows why a referendum is essential »
- What did the public say about the government’s Indigenous Voice co-design process? »
- How do the major parties rate on the First Nations Voice to Parliament? We asked 5 experts »
- We keep hearing about a First Nations Voice to parliament, but what would it actually look like in practice? »
- First Nations people shouldn’t have to wait for a referendum to get a Voice to Parliament »
- Have a heart: PM urges both sides of politics to support indigenous voice »
- Marcia Langton calls for decisive action from the government to fix past failures and constitution that ‘remains racist’ ahead of Garma Festival »
- Indigenous Voice to parliament detail to come after referendum, Anthony Albanese says »
- Alan Kohler: Why the Voice is an economic as well as moral issue »
- Uluru Statement co-author makes the case for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament »
- The Voice is an invitation to the Australian people »
Australians back a voice to parliament. The moment is there to be seized
Paul Daley comments in The Guardian (4.6.21) on growing popular support for an Indigenous voice to parliament, suggesting that there is similar hope now as there was around the reconciliation movement in 2000.
‘This year Australia’s National Reconciliation Week went with the theme: ‘More than a word. Reconciliation takes action.’ Yes, the need for meaningful action is urgent and hard to fault.
‘“How and when are you going to pay the rent?” is the question so many Indigenous people want answered regarding reparations for the stolen land, countless murders and ruined lives.
‘Corporates and cultural organisations showcasing participation in Reconciliation Week might like to ask themselves how “paying the rent” works. Is it more than investing in Indigenous art for the boardroom? How many Indigenous staff do they actually employ? What NGOs that make real differences to Indigenous lives do they invest substantively in? What do they do for the rest of the year?
‘… It is almost 14 years since Howard – facing an electoral abyss – vowed to hold a referendum to recognise Indigenous Australians in the constitution if re-elected. Many Aboriginal people then, as today, don’t want recognition in the founding document of the settler state. They want treaties, truth-telling and reparations.’
- Australians back a voice to parliament. The moment is there to be seized »
- Most Australians support First Nations Voice to parliament: survey »
- Timing is (almost) everything »
- Why delaying legislation on a Voice to parliament is welcome – it allows more time to get things right »
- Our research shows public support for a First Nations Voice is not only high, it’s deeply entrenched »
- Indigenous Voice model revealed – but no national representation until after 2022 election »
- Voice to Parliament design report still doesn’t meet international human rights standards »
- Indigenous leaders say ‘it’s time for a referendum’ on First Nations Voice to Parliament »
- Indigenous Australians have been forgotten in this election campaign but the conversation won’t go away »
- Australians urged to back Indigenous voice to parliament in History is Calling campaign »
- Why wait? Treaty and the federal election »
- The Uluru Statement must be core to promises made by all parties in the lead-up to the federal election »
- Voice to parliament is not enough: What happened to Indigenous issues in the federal election campaign? »
- Labor promises to ‘move quickly’ on Indigenous voice to parliament referendum if elected »
- Thirty years on, the Uluru Statement from the Heart campaign can draw inspiration from Mabo »
- The Albanese government has committed to enshrining a First Nations Voice in the Constitution. What do Australians think of the idea? »
- Indigenous Australia: Uluru Statement from the Heart is a gift to the nation, not a grab for power »
- Creating a constitutional Voice – the words that could change Australia »
- Top constitutional lawyers say Voice does not have a veto over parliament »
- Fighting for a Voice »
- Not a voice but a shout »
- The Voice alone won’t solve the issues facing Indigenous people. Everyone has to do that work